Tunisia vs. Japan - Exact Score

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

Tunisia meet Japan in a World Cup group-stage match, with the market settling on the exact score after 90 minutes plus stoppage time only, so late extra-time or penalties are irrelevant here. A 2% crowd price implies a very specific scoreline is seen as a long shot, and that is consistent with the market’s broad “Any Other Score” risk when the likely outcomes are spread across several low-scoring results.

The historical frame leans towards Japan being the more probable winner: the sides have met four times, with Japan winning three and Tunisia once, and their most recent meeting ended 2-0 to Japan in October 2023. FIFA also lists this as a first-stage match at the 2026 tournament, which matters because group-stage incentives can produce conservative scorelines if a draw suits one or both teams. On accessibility, German users should note that GlüStV rules can make access to offshore prediction markets more sensitive from a compliance standpoint, while US-facing activity can sit within the CFTC’s reach if a market is offered to or trades with US persons; that is an enforcement and product-structure issue, not a guarantee of local legality.

For traders, the key catalysts are the confirmed team sheets, any injury or suspension news, and whether either side is already under pressure from the group table before kick-off. A recent FIFA match-centre listing has the fixture scheduled for 21 June 2026, so settlement risk is mainly about whether the match starts and finishes as planned, since postponement would keep the market open until completion. A no-KYC up to $1,500 structure means smaller positions may be accessible without identity checks, but larger activity typically requires verification, which affects how quickly some users can enter or scale into this exact-score price.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page reviews Tunisia vs. Japan - Exact Score across five venues. We show live odds for Polymarket-based markets (sourced from the Polygon order book); for other venues we list platform attributes, since the comparable contracts are not exposed via a public API on every venue. Every CTA points at Polymarket KYC UK — the application we operate, where you trade directly against the Polymarket order book at 0% fees.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On Polymarket KYC UK, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

Polymarket KYC UK is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on Polymarket KYC UK?

Zero. Polymarket KYC UK routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, Polymarket KYC UK triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.