Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

3DMAX and Liquid were due to meet in a CS Asia Championships 2026 lower-bracket knockout match, with the listing still live on tournament and streaming pages on 21 May. A 0% YES price is best read as an access and settlement artefact rather than a sporting judgement: when a match is already underway or rescheduled close to the settlement window, some markets can remain quoted at zero even though the outcome is still unresolved. Comparable CS2 bracket markets often reprice only after an official result, not when a fixture is merely delayed or moved, so the key question is whether PGL confirms play and completes the series within the market’s window.

For traders, the immediate catalysts are the organiser’s schedule updates, stream status, and any bracket reshuffle if the lower-bracket slot changes again. Liquipedia lists the event’s group stage as Bo1 opening matches and Bo3 thereafter, while live YouTube listings on 21 May showed 3DMAX versus Liquid as a Group Stage elimination match, underscoring that the official match state matters more than the original fixture time. On the regulatory side, German GlüStV treatment is relevant because internet gambling-style access can trigger local restrictions and operator controls, while US CFTC reach matters where a platform serves American users or references event contracts with US-facing compliance limits. In practical terms, “no-KYC up to $1,500” means a user may be able to access and trade this market with limited identity checks until cumulative thresholds are hit, but it does not remove jurisdictional blocks, withdrawal checks, or platform-specific AML/KYC reviews.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

We track Counter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Liquid (BO3) - CS Asia Championships Group B on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Where can I trade this market with the lowest fees?

On PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book at 0% fees. Kalshi charges up to 7% per trade; Betfair Exchange takes 2-5% commission on net winnings.

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.