LoL: KaBuM! Ilha das Lendas vs Vivo Keyd Stars Academy (BO5) - Circuito Desafiante Playoffs

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

KaBuM! Ilha das Lendas are due to face Vivo Keyd Stars Academy in the Circuito Desafiante upper-bracket final, a best-of-five that is currently the key path into the latter stages of Brazil’s tier-two League of Legends playoffs. The market’s 0% YES price should be read against both the fixture’s uncertainty and the fact that settlement turns on the actual winner, not merely whether the series is played. In practical access terms, a no-KYC route up to $1,500 makes smaller positions straightforward for many users, but the regulatory overlay still matters: German users face the GlüStV framework, while the US CFTC’s reach is relevant wherever a contract is offered or intermediated into the United States. That does not change the esports result, but it does shape who can participate and how.

Recent comparable context points away from treating this as a trivial mismatch. Vivo Keyd Stars Academy beat KaBuM! Ilha das Lendas 3-2 in the UB final on 20 May, according to Strafe, after both sides had already shown enough form to reach the upper bracket at all. Leaguepedia’s season table also shows KaBuM! finishing the group stage strongly, which helps explain why the line can move sharply around a rematch in a short playoff window. The earlier result is the most relevant benchmark, because BO5 series in this bracket have already shown that map-level swings can extend the contest even when one side is favoured.

The main catalysts are scheduling and any official bracket changes. Sofascore currently lists the match for 26 May at 20:00 UTC, rather than the originally circulated 4:00 PM ET slot, so traders should watch for confirmation from organiser channels and team posts before assuming the timing is fixed. Any postponement, re-seed, or format change would matter because this market resolves only once a winner is determined within the allowed window. For accessibility, the no-KYC threshold up to $1,500 is relevant only to entry frictions; it does not alter the underlying settlement rule, which remains tied to the official result.

Sources: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5

Methodology

This page is a comparison snapshot: one live quote (Polymarket), four reference venues with their key attributes, and a single execution path — every trade button routes to PolyGram, which mirrors the Polymarket order book directly.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

Do I need to KYC for this market?

Not under $1,500 of lifetime trading volume. Above that threshold, PolyGram triggers a quick verification flow that finishes in minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.