LoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend

Platform comparison

Active sub-markets

Market context

JD Gaming face Anyone's Legend in a League of Legends best-of-three match within the LPL Group Ascend competition, scheduled for 10 May 2026 at 07:00 ET. The match outcome determines whether JD Gaming advance or whether Anyone's Legend secure the upset victory. Settlement occurs immediately upon match conclusion, with a 50-50 resolution triggered only if the match is cancelled entirely, ends in a tie, or remains unresolved beyond seven days from the scheduled start.

The current 49% implied probability for JD Gaming reflects genuine competitive uncertainty rather than a clear favourite-underdog split. Historical LPL Group Ascend fixtures show that seeding advantages often compress during group stages, where roster depth and meta adaptation matter as much as raw ranking. Recent comparable matches between established LPL organisations and emerging challengers have settled within 45–55% ranges when both teams field competitive lineups, suggesting the market is pricing genuine competitive balance rather than overweighting JD Gaming's organisational pedigree.

Traders should monitor LPL official announcements regarding roster changes, player availability, or schedule adjustments through to settlement. Meta shifts in patch notes released before 10 May could favour either team's champion pool or playstyle. Team scrimmage results and public practice footage, if disclosed by either organisation, may shift market sentiment in the final 48 hours. The settlement window closes at 17:20 UTC on 10 May, allowing approximately ten hours post-match for official result confirmation before resolution locks.

Methodology

We track LoL: JD Gaming vs Anyone's Legend (BO3) - LPL Group Ascend on the five venues with material liquidity for prediction markets. Live odds come from the Polymarket Polygon order book — the only source that ships real-time data under an open licence. For Kalshi, Betfair and Manifold we list platform attributes (fee, KYC, settlement, payment) instead of fabricated odds, because their APIs use non-comparable contract definitions.

Resolution & payout

Settlement runs on-chain. Polymarket's contract logic separates YES and NO shares as conditional tokens; at resolution the winning share lifts to $1.00 and the losing one to $0. The outcome input comes from the UMA Optimistic Oracle, which secures against bad resolution with a bond + dispute window.

Once finalised, the smart contract pays USDC to the holders' wallets within minutes — no withdrawal fees beyond Polygon network gas. Kalshi settles in USD via CFTC clearance, Betfair in account currency net of commission, Manifold in play-money mana with no cash-out.

FAQ

Is this market available outside the US?

PolyGram is available in most jurisdictions where Polymarket isn't directly accessible. Polymarket itself is geo-blocked in the US/UK/EU. Always check local regulations.

What's the difference between YES and NO shares?

A YES share pays $1.00 if the event happens, $0 otherwise. A NO share pays $1.00 if the event doesn't happen. The market price between 0¢ and 100¢ is the implied probability.

What does it cost to trade on PolyGram?

Zero. PolyGram routes every order to the live Polymarket order book; the only cost is the Polygon network fee, typically under $0.01 per transaction.

How fast are USDC deposits?

Polygon credits deposits after 12 confirmations — usually under 30 seconds. Withdrawals follow the same path and land back in your wallet within minutes.

How reliable are the quoted odds?

The YES/NO percentages are the live mid-prices of the Polymarket order book. On deep markets they move every few seconds; on thinner ones you'll see short plateaus.